AADA hosts congressional briefing and free public skin cancer screenings on Capitol Hill
The briefing featured Brett Coldiron, MD, FAAD, president-elect, AADA; Rep. Dent; Sen. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), skin cancer prevention advocate; Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), skin cancer survivor; RADM Boris D. Lushniak, MD, MPH, Deputy Surgeon General and a dermatologist; Alyson Fuller, Ph.D., former indoor tanner and melanoma skin cancer survivor; and Johnny Bench, Baseball Hall of Famer and skin cancer survivor. Other representatives attending the event included Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), and Trey Radel (R-Fla.).
A contingent of national organizations joined the AADA to highlight the dangers of indoor tanning including the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, the American College of Mohs Surgery, the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery Association, the American Society for Mohs Surgery, the Melanoma Research Foundation, the National Council on Skin Cancer Prevention, and The Skin Cancer Foundation. Following the briefing, seven AAD member dermatologists conducted 69 free skin cancer screenings for Capitol Hill staff and the general public.
The AADA has been working closely with regulatory agencies, and both state and federal legislatures to protect minors from the dangers of indoor tanning. Learn more about the AADA’s congressional indoor tanning activities. For more information, contact Christine O’Connor at email@example.com.
AADA to weigh in on Senate Medicare reform proposals
In the letter, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Ranking Member Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) called on providers to suggest reforms that would ensure that physician services are valued appropriately, policies that could work with the current fee-for-service (FFS) system, and incentives that could encourage physician participation in alternative payment models. Read the Senate Finance Committee letter.
The Senate Finance Committee also held a hearing on May 14 to discuss the need to replace the SGR formula. Sens. Baucus and Hatch called on the committee to replace the SGR this year, reiterating a key advantage in the Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO) reduction of the estimated cost for repealing the SGR — from an estimated $243.7 billion to just under $140 billion over the next 10 years. On Tuesday, CBO released updated numbers, which estimates the cost of SGR repeal at $139.1 billion over the next decade.
In April, the AADA sent recommendations to the House Ways and Means Committee and the Energy and Commerce Committee regarding their recent proposal on Medicare payment reform. Read more about the AADA’s recommendations on SGR reform. The AADA will submit comments to the Senate Finance Committee prior to the May 31 deadline. For more information, contact the AADA at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Senate confirms Tavenner as CMS administrator
AADA recommends policy changes to improve use of electronic health records
The AADA’s response stemmed from a recently issued white paper titled “REBOOT: Re-Examining the Strategies Needed to Successfully Adopt Health IT,” which was authored by Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.), Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.), Sen. Tom Coburn, MD (R-Okla.), Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.), and Sen. Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.). The white paper summarized the key implementation deficiencies for adopting health information technology (HIT) as increased costs, lack of oversight, patient privacy risks, program sustainability, and the lack of a clear path for interoperability.
The AADA recommended instituting vendor-driven solutions to improve interoperability, and reiterated its concerns about the ability for small practices to afford EHR systems. Additionally, the AADA called for the creation of a hardship exemption from meaningful use requirements for physicians in and near retirement to avoid intensifying workforce shortages.
The AADA also addressed several of the authors’ concerns about alleged fraud and abuse with meaningful use payments, and potential “upcoding.” The AADA addressed these allegations and noted that many of the entities accepting payments have invested considerably more than the incentive payments they received in their electronic health record infrastructure, with little assurance that they would reap the full benefit of their investment. Citing a lack of hard evidence that physicians are upcoding, the AADA also noted that the issues may not be a physician problem, but may be linked to software programming issues. Read the AADA’s response letter. For more information, contact Shawn Friesen at email@example.com, or Richard Martin at firstname.lastname@example.org.
FDA proposes stricter regulations on indoor tanning devices
The FDA announced that it is proposing to raise the classification for sunlamps and tanning beds to a Class II level which institutes stricter regulations to protect the public health. Currently, indoor tanning devices are Class I, the category for items that have minimal potential to cause harm to individuals, such as adhesive bandages and tongue depressors. Read more about the FDA’s proposed order on tanning devices.
The AADA recognizes that there is still more work to be done to protect the public from these dangerous devices, and will continue to work closely with the FDA and state legislative and regulatory bodies to prohibit the use and sale of indoor tanning devices for minors under the age of 18. Read the AADA’s position statement on indoor tanning. The AADA will provide comments in support of these regulations prior to the 90-day deadline, and will continue to communicate to the FDA the need for stricter regulations on the use and sale of indoor tanning devices. Contact Amanda Grimm, senior specialist, AADA regulatory policy at email@example.com for more information.
Under-18 indoor tanning ban bills sent to governors in Texas, Oregon; die in Alabama, Florida
Gov. Perry must sign or veto the bill within 10 days, or it becomes law without signature. If Gov. Perry vetoes the legislation, a two-thirds vote in each house will be required to override his veto. Read the letter of support from the American Academy of Dermatology Association (AADA) on Senate Bill 329. For Texas-based dermatologists looking to share their support for SB 329 with Gov. Perry, contact his office by calling (512) 463-2000, or send a message via Gov. Perry’s website.
In Oregon, House Bill (HB) 2896 has passed the House and Senate and has been sent to Gov. John Kitzhaber, MD. The Governor has indicated that he will sign the bill into law. HB 2896 prohibits minors under the age of 18 from using indoor tanning devices. The Oregon Dermatology Society, the Oregon Health & Science University Department of Dermatology (OHSU Dermatology), and the AADA, sent a letter of support for this bill to the Oregon Senate Committee on Health Care and Human Services in March.
Legislation banning minors from indoor tanning in Alabama and Florida died in committee last week. As introduced, Alabama HB 179 and Florida SB 1674 would have prohibited minors under the age of 18 from using indoor tanning devices. For more information, contact Kersten Burns at firstname.lastname@example.org.
AADA, New Jersey dermatologists testify against bill that would prohibit in-office procedures
S-2079 would require that operations — such as liposuction procedures that involve more than 750 cubic centimeters of aspirate, procedures that utilize a breast implant, and aesthetic truncal contouring procedures involving the excision of skin — take place in accredited ambulatory surgery centers and hospitals.
The AADA and DSNJ argued that this legislation could in fact hinder patient safety, access to dermatological procedures, and lead to even higher health care costs in New Jersey. Additionally, the groups argued that the passage of this bill could set a precedent for legislation that would not ensure patient safety, but rather negatively affects patient access to minor surgeries, which are safely performed in physician offices. Read the AADA’s letter of opposition. For more information, contact Lisa Albany at email@example.com.
Indoor tanning legislation moves forward in Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Connecticut
Ohio’s House Bill (HB) 131, which would also prohibit minors under 18 from using indoor tanning devices, was heard in the House Health and Aging Committee on Wednesday and is awaiting a vote. Similar legislation, SB 113, was introduced in the Ohio Senate and is awaiting a Senate hearing. Read the AADA’s letter of support for HB 131.
In Pennsylvania, HB 1259 which would prohibit minors under 17 from using indoor tanning devices was heard by the House Health Committee this week and passed unanimously. The bill now awaits a vote by the full House. The Philadelphia City Council is considering an ordinance, Bill Number 130057, that would prohibit any minor under 14 years from using an indoor tanning device without a prescription. Bruce Brod, MD, FAAD, testified on behalf of the proposed ordinance this week. The ordinance passed unanimously out of committee and will go to the full council for consideration. Read the AADA and Pennsylvania Academy of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery’s letters of support for HB 1259 and Philadelphia Bill Number 130057.
In Connecticut, the Senate passed indoor tanning bill SB 872 unanimously, which would ban indoor tanning for minors under the age of 17. The bill was amended prior to passing, lowering the age restriction from under 18. The bill will now go to the House.
The AADA has been providing assistance to state societies that are supporting legislation that would protect minors from the dangers of indoor tanning. Read more about the AADA’s state advocacy efforts. For more information, contact Kersten Burns at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Biosimilar legislation reaches Florida governor; dies in Colorado
The American Academy of Dermatology Association (AADA) and the Florida Society of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery initially supported HB 365. However, the groups sent a joint letter of opposition to the Florida Senate when the bill was altered and, as a result, the requirement that pharmacists inform the health care provider of a biosimilar substitution was removed. The notification requirement was removed because legislators argued that it would impede access or cause significant burden on the pharmacy. Read the AADA's comment letters on Engrossed House Bill 365.
Similar legislation has died in Colorado. The AADA worked with the Colorado Dermatologic Society to send a letter of support for Colorado HB 1121, which was similar to the original version of Florida HB 365.
To learn more about biosimilars and dermatology, review the AADA’s position statement on generic therapeutic and biosimilar substitution and look for a feature article in the June 2013 issue of Dermatology World. For more information, contact Lisa Albany at email@example.com.
Register for the 2013 AADA Legislative Conference